From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is there any elisp functions to tell whether the cursor is in a comment block? Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:44:58 +0200 Message-ID: <487B747A.7030000@gmail.com> References: <87tzetis7w.fsf@DEBLAP1.BeNet> <71bcf427-442c-45b8-95d6-5f8289c85297@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <87iqv8sdyi.fsf@DEBLAP1.BeNet> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216050338 13321 80.91.229.12 (14 Jul 2008 15:45:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 14 17:46:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KIQFk-0004zx-9j for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:46:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KIQEs-00020Y-0b for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KIQEa-00020T-8K for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KIQEY-00020A-57 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60336 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KIQEX-000205-SO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:54457) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIQEX-0008O7-Da for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-59.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.59]:63339 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KIQEV-0008OH-5v for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:45:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87iqv8sdyi.fsf@DEBLAP1.BeNet> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080712-0, 2008-07-12), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.145.59 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KIQEV-0008OH-5v. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KIQEV-0008OH-5v bc0ecdedf32bee09eb08ae02aa70fc7d X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:55561 Archived-At: Joe Bloggs wrote: > I guess I would have to adapt Johan's code to get it to work in > emacs 21, but thanks anyway. Just out of curiosity: Why don't you upgrade to Emacs 22?