From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: code completion Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:24:49 +0000 Message-ID: <47D86641.7000307@gnu.org> References: <63pnmnF269411U1@mid.dfncis.de> <87ejafwwir.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com> <47D857AC.3040003@gmail.com> <47D8648E.4010100@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205364328 2738 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2008 23:25:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 00:25:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZaKG-0006lz-JP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:25:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZaJh-0000MP-T2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZaJe-0000M7-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:24:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZaJc-0000Lk-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:24:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZaJa-0000L6-D0; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:24:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.32]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZaJa-00083x-4q; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:24:54 -0400 Original-X-Trace: 26150713/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkcBAO8C2EdTQxds/2dsb2JhbAAIpn4 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5250"; a="26150713" X-IP-Direction: OUT Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO [192.168.249.28]) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 12 Mar 2008 23:24:52 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) In-Reply-To: <47D8648E.4010100@gmail.com> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92336 gmane.emacs.help:52331 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > But parsing xml can't be as fast as just reading elisp code, or? But > maybe the speed difference would be negligable, I do not know. I just did some unscientific testing, and the lisp xml parser we have now seems to parse at about 700kB/s on my machine. How large is the output that would need to be parsed?