From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ralf Angeli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: rmail Setup Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:46:59 +0200 Organization: nil Message-ID: <46580213$0$23148$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> References: <1179409310.620539.228430@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1179861309.907251.54120@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <87veehhn2e.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: angeli@caeruleus.net NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180176032 22881 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2007 10:40:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 10:40:32 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 26 12:40:31 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HrthH-0007dD-EI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 May 2007 12:40:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrthG-0004JQ-VS for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 May 2007 06:40:30 -0400 Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vj2zVGdClm53tK5uBm+dHc6kots= Original-Lines: 10 Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 2007 11:46:59 CEST Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: aeaec0b0.newsspool1.arcor-online.net Original-X-Trace: DXC=SfZ>RPg; 7HlUoRk[hk2Walic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRaFl8W>\BH3Yblj^i]OE List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:44453 Archived-At: * Xavier Maillard (2007-05-26) writes: > Also consider "getmail" over "fetchmail". > > What are the advantages of getmail over fetchmail ? Haven't you read the FAQ? -- Ralf