From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: EmacsW32 invocation options Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:03:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4638A852.3010004@gmail.com> References: <59osrdF2m97hgU1@mid.individual.net> <4637A396.9000300@gmail.com> <46383B57.6050508@gmail.com> <87ejlzjv27.fsf@gmail.com> <4638A094.8090708@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178118246 25666 80.91.229.12 (2 May 2007 15:04:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Hadron To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 02 17:04:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjGN7-0006U6-HU for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 17:04:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGTX-0008Ky-9u for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGTJ-0008Kk-O6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGTH-0008KU-Qy for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGTH-0008KR-ME for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:10:23 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjGMr-0004UM-24 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:03:45 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:64445 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HjGMp-0007FU-4c; Wed, 02 May 2007 17:03:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000737-2, 2007-04-30), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HjGMp-0007FU-4c. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HjGMp-0007FU-4c 3c4d601519a7742542bf709d868f6ec7 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43508 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > Yes. I think that's the main problem. There was no need to rush that. > It is nice for emacsclient to be able to start the server, but it is > not a pressing need. The alternative is a few more clicks every now > and then (not each time emacsclient is run). I was concerned about new users. Every difficulty when trying to start using Emacs is a big thing. And if you are on MS Windows it was very difficult to get started. >> I also added a switch >> >> --server-file FILENAME >> >> for which I wrote "Set filename of the TCP authentication file". > > You must be talking about some other thing. IIRC, I added that switch: Eh, yes you are right. > I'm not keen on rehearsing the discussion; I think there's not one > single way to start the local server. A way to pass that setup info is > needed. I am sure there is more to know about that than I do. However if you are talking about user specific elisp code that must be ran I believe it is possible to extend the solution in my patched Emacs client without difficulties.