From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: EmacsW32 invocation options Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 15:28:14 +0200 Message-ID: <463891EE.60804@gmail.com> References: <59osrdF2m97hgU1@mid.individual.net> <4637A396.9000300@gmail.com> <46383B57.6050508@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178112525 2551 80.91.229.12 (2 May 2007 13:28:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 02 15:28:42 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjEsr-0001Ft-PQ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 15:28:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjEzH-0007A7-0B for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 09:35:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjEz1-00078d-2r for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 09:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjEyz-00077q-FC for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 09:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjEyz-00077n-7q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 09:35:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjEsY-0007RE-D9; Wed, 02 May 2007 09:28:22 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:64177 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HjEsW-00033Y-6Y; Wed, 02 May 2007 15:28:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000737-2, 2007-04-30), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HjEsW-00033Y-6Y. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1HjEsW-00033Y-6Y a9308261efc1002e7bb9df70e8267848 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43494 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > I'm obviously not Eli, but I think there were good reasons for not > wanting the code in Emacs at the present. For one, althought I like > the functionality, I think it could benefit from some more discussion; > also, I don't like the implementation. Yes, more discussion would be good. I really tried to open a discussion about it, but I did not get much company. >> Not one single of the new users have complained about this. > > Users who enter Emacs through your distribution don't know it is > currently supposed to be different. Did you read the download page for Emacs+EmacsW32? Did you read the documentation on the web pages about the patches? > And I seem to remember at least a few bug reports... I am not aware of any bugs that have not been fixed. None of the problems where related to the changes to Emacs client.