From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Herschel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Possible hidden html tags in straight text in eamcs? Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:42:28 -0400 Message-ID: <462BF2E4.4020107@comcast.net> References: <462BE364.4070103@comcast.net> <462BE5BE.9040904@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177285195 17235 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2007 23:39:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:39:55 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 23 01:39:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hfleq-0004BW-C3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:39:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HflkA-0001Jt-NP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hfljw-0001It-Qx for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hflju-0001HO-Rf for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hflju-0001H2-GN for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.192.83]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HfleZ-0008HR-4m for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:39:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.12] (c-69-248-86-28.hsd1.nj.comcast.net[69.248.86.28]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20070422233933m130067fpje>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:39:34 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070221) In-Reply-To: <462BE5BE.9040904@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 X-detected-kernel: NetCache Data OnTap 5.x X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43002 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > Herschel wrote: >> I attempted several searches without finding any getting matches. It >> might be that I am not good at guessing terms used. >> >> I doubt they exist, but can invisible tags exist in a web page I have >> written in emacs that act like an inserted line break, e.g.
or >>

? That's what I am seeing whether direct use of the browser, or using >> the html option and viewing the code rendered. It's weird, because the >> lines in the editor are uniformly wrapped and nothing is visible where >> the lines break when rendered. Efforts to delete such hidden tags have >> failed, hence, I am at loss what I might have encountered. > > > A small example would help us understand what you mean. > Just figured it out putting in the examples. I have superscripts, and the line spacing is too tight to fit, hence it was these lines forcing greater spacing. I sincerely appreciated your question, had I not attempted to answer your request for a greater explanation by pasting in the sample code I would not have seen the answer. I was in the midst explaining the breaks. It was a sample I pasted in that suddenly expanded the line spacing, at first I looked for a hidden code, or the area I copied to see if I took part of the blank line, then I saw the superscript sitting just too high. Really, almost laughing out loud. Thank you!!