From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthew Flaschen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Binding same command to two separte keys?? Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:23:29 -0400 Message-ID: <462002E1.6040102@gatech.edu> References: <1176490954.3065.75.camel@CASE> <1176491561.32280.9.camel@oaktree.karlheg.lan> <461FD736.2080709@gatech.edu> <1176495452.3065.121.camel@CASE> <461FF068.6000203@gatech.edu> <87hcrkos73.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176503104 20262 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2007 22:25:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 22:25:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 14 00:25:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HcUCU-0000d7-Ii for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:25:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcUGm-0006pt-Us for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:29:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HcUFN-0005VW-3Y for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HcUFL-0005Ui-BE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcUFL-0005Uc-5X for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:27:59 -0400 Original-Received: from deliverator4.gatech.edu ([130.207.165.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HcUB1-0006RL-1R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:23:31 -0400 Original-Received: from deliverator4.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 03D9AA49D for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:23:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matthew.flaschen@gatech.edu) Original-Received: from mailprx1.gatech.edu (mailprx1.prism.gatech.edu [130.207.171.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.mail.gatech.edu", Issuer "RSA Data Security, Inc." (verified OK)) by deliverator4.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D968FA491 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:23:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matthew.flaschen@gatech.edu) Original-Received: from [128.61.73.81] (r73h81.res.gatech.edu [128.61.73.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (sasl: method=PLAIN, username=mflaschen3@mailprx1.gatech.edu, sender=n/a) by mailprx1.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20612740 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:23:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matthew.flaschen@gatech.edu) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) In-Reply-To: <87hcrkos73.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 X-detected-kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:42658 Archived-At: David Hansen wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:04:40 -0400 Matthew Flaschen wrote: > >> kbd is supposed to be an easy method to unify all the others, but >> I think it's slightly (perhaps negligibly) slower. > > In byte-compiled code it's not slower. IMHO it's the most readable > and therefore preferable way to write key bindings. Maybe so, but he's not going to byte-compile .emacs . > >>> So ... in (global-set-key (kbd "M-s") #'shell-command) >> No, just >> (global-set-key (kbd "M-s") 'shell-command) > > #'symbol is the same as (function symbol). It never harms to use it > when passing functions as an argument and in some cases the compiler > can use this hint for optimization. Okay, thanks. Matthew Flaschen