From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ralf Angeli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How to redefine Parantheses? Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:53:49 +0200 Organization: nil Message-ID: <461d129c$0$10194$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> References: <57rjbgF2eksvjU1@mid.individual.net> <4618b74e$0$23142$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <46195b6b$0$23139$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <461a003b$0$23145$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <461a79e0$0$20296$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <461bcaf8$0$6405$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <461bea8f$0$23148$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Reply-To: angeli@caeruleus.net NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176312983 4025 80.91.229.12 (11 Apr 2007 17:36:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 11 19:36:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hbgjs-0005hY-9P for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:36:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hbgnw-0000fw-8b for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:40:24 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newshub.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!proxad.net!proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.96 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NsG8oSjUFF6UjT0MnQod93Ri0Lo= Original-Lines: 19 Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Apr 2007 18:53:48 CEST Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: f8abedff.newsspool4.arcor-online.net Original-X-Trace: DXC=JUT1?oHQcX>TQL:hoD@>T?4IUK392BQYIaSb9D\SojI5:1j=_25oOlWSAM9f@ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:42588 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii (2007-04-11) writes: >> From: Ralf Angeli >> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:50:39 +0200 >> >> We are running round in circles. > > Maybe you are; I ain't. You asked me to explain what behavior I like > about the current syntax, and I answered. It is okay to disagree; > there's certainly no need to reiterate why you dislike the current > behavior, because you already stated that. I tried to clarify why changing the default syntax is better than leaving it. In addition I provided information on what to expect from changing the syntax by example of AUCTeX. Please don't just ignore that. -- Ralf