From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: M-! -- new or other binding ?? Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:11:50 +0200 Message-ID: <461D5D26.6090800@gmail.com> References: <1176328029.3064.146.camel@CASE> <461D58E0.1020406@gmail.com> <1176329105.3064.153.camel@CASE> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176329521 24236 80.91.229.12 (11 Apr 2007 22:12:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: EMACS List To: William Case Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 12 00:11:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hbl2l-0004UX-6F for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:11:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hbl6q-00039d-Gs for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:16:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hbl6c-00039O-N9 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hbl6a-000399-KV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hbl6a-000390-Dw for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hbl2U-0005ps-28 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:11:42 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:64571 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hbl2R-0002hW-9X; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:11:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <1176329105.3064.153.camel@CASE> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000733-0, 2007-04-11), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Hbl2R-0002hW-9X. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1Hbl2R-0002hW-9X df4a355a7064e6dac00cbe230a862590 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:42596 Archived-At: William Case wrote: > Yes, I saw the .../wiki/StickyModifiers and after receiving your > suggestion read it carefully. As a first solution I was hoping to find > a keyboarding slight of hand or an alternative key binding. The problem > with the sticky key solution is that it affects all keys and I am only > having a problem with one key combination at the moment. But I haven't > thrown out stickkeys as a solution if I can't find something else. What is the problem with stickykeys really? You can continue typing as you used to. (As long as you do not accidently hit any of the modifier keys Alt, Ctrl or Shift. And if you do some system can display their status too which you might check when you are unsure.)