From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: MY window tree! Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:47:35 +0100 Message-ID: <45ABBE37.9090202@gmail.com> References: <45A8B034.8020301@gmx.at> <45AAA21C.6090505@gmail.com> <45AAB98F.8060404@gmail.com> <45AB2CDB.1040207@gmx.at> <45AB7C99.6050002@gmail.com> <45AB8B1F.7010408@gmail.com> <45AB92A8.7030300@gmail.com> <45ABAC9E.9020607@gmail.com> <45ABBB05.9090804@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168889413 2587 80.91.229.12 (15 Jan 2007 19:30:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, michael@cadilhac.name Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 15 20:30:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H6W0D-0007VC-9n for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:52:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6W0D-00036q-7c for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:52:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6Vxo-0001AF-NK for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:49:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6Vxl-000170-Tr for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:49:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6Vxl-00016d-HP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:49:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.213] (helo=ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H6Vw2-0006X3-9G for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:47:55 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:61673 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H6Vvz-0004ll-6W; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:47:51 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: martin rudalics In-Reply-To: <45ABBB05.9090804@gmx.at> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0703-1, 2007-01-15), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H6Vvz-0004ll-6W. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1H6Vvz-0004ll-6W 5f6363ac1ac6c55b51839268dc51e1d3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:40321 Archived-At: martin rudalics wrote: > Why check all buffers? Juanma's recipe was precise in my opinion. Note > that buffers may have overlays for windows that are no more live. These > overlays are useless and prevent the windows from being collected. They > are harmless, though. I can not see why only displayed buffers should be interesting. A buffer that is not currently displayed could also have a 'window property pointing to some of those windows we are interested in. Or?