From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: vanekl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Which is the best implementation of LISP family of languages for real world programming ? Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <395dff9e-739a-4b0a-8b18-3ee4ba05e1fa__14949.1142751232$1291947405$gmane$org@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> References: <19522f8e-d5b5-4b6f-942b-423602e44993@z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <7bIQn.18559$if1.4183@uutiset.elisa.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291947405 13794 80.91.229.12 (10 Dec 2010 02:16:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:16:45 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 10 03:16:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQsXH-0007as-Kp for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 03:16:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38882 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PQsGk-0003Bj-2Q for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:59:34 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help, comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.scheme, comp.lang.python, comp.lang.javascript Original-Lines: 20 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.179.102.62 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1276337089 19221 127.0.0.1 (12 Jun 2010 10:04:49 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=207.179.102.62; posting-account=hNuVOgoAAAA6k8SYZzsAd-4078o3nzxz User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.3a6pre) Gecko/20100611 Minefield/3.7a6pre (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:178860 comp.lang.lisp:288961 comp.lang.scheme:86959 comp.lang.python:634727 comp.lang.javascript:603552 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:23:36 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:77185 Archived-At: Antti "Andy" Ylikoski wrote: snip > Maybe it could be a good idea for someone to write an academic study > of all these available Lisp implementations. Even Interlisp still > lives, as it was recently noted in this newsgroup. (I did not check > the Google. Has someone alredy done so? Ie. studied the existing > many Lisp implementations?) > > regards, Antti J. Ylikoski > Helsinki, Finland, the E.U. Common Lisp Implementations: A Survey http://common-lisp.net/~dlw/LispSurvey.html You bring up a good point -- there are so many mature lisp implementations that you can "jump" implementations until you find one that meets your needs. -- Did you know that dolphins are just gay sharks?