From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexandros Prekates Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: failing creating multiple indirect org buffers . Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:37:22 +0000 Message-ID: <20240304103722.13655694@enoush2o> References: <20240301094752.3918b636@enoush2o> <86ttlqqs26.fsf@gnu.org> <20240301104731.30dcadd1@enoush2o> <86msrhoz1b.fsf@gnu.org> <878r30xgvr.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4153"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 04 09:38:29 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3q8-0000rs-FD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:38:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3pc-00061l-2t; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 03:37:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3pG-00060q-Cf for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 03:37:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rh3pD-0005w8-BP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 03:37:33 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 223BD240027 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:37:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1709541444; bh=5nd1rP/mZjuPag1t6c7SkpBaAioCzFD2eABFkTh7rM4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=Wvll2G1SBQEspxVJXYY4/yxpsSn+Prl6EKcJ+AdXY+STyXTK0ir8tO/9qqPgwn4zh VNx1uyDFo1Sk5hKh2bDb5nfHrjJpr7X0fLyuL5i/YTsOmCkMKGrcX6TM9Wvg57r1+m cXhr+AMFSCk6+GqKFZ+LB68lW4e4d10ZjC8KS4W+NCd5tpBJadR8imT4owU96mkdeY e/xFDpTe8hxu3ajw305g3A5A0Gp/xJLk926jcx0XJG3POVH1AZyl8TpwOg20wKdCge 7r0YaerzK1EB3Zbx7h1rTpuvjt1xYn7uX5JEquxVs+qfZXMEd3cTdx69/mwiMKHhr7 zGZ1xDG0W2GgA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TpBrz5PQ2z6tvl for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:37:23 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <878r30xgvr.fsf@web.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=aprekates@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:146038 Archived-At: On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 02:07:20 +0100 Michael Heerdegen via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor wrote: > But I am exactly seeing this, actually. Folding in all indirect > clones works independently for me, even when there are more than 2 > clones. And even if I clone a clone. In emacs -Q. Unfortunately emacs -Q doesnt change things. > > Such things don't work reliably always, however. For example, when > anything relies on text properties, which are shared, things break. > So whether things like this work as expected often depends on > implementation details that don't matter in any other situation (and > what the user expects). Using indirect clones is always an a bit > fragile matter in my experience. > Thanks for that insight. > > Michael. > > Alexandros