From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jonetsu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Using gdb (windows popping up) Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:00:45 -0400 Message-ID: <20190610100045.61c22fe0@mistral> References: <20190609115246.41281b50@mistral> <83ftoibofg.fsf@gnu.org> <20190609145921.0fc60f3c@mistral> <83ef42bmij.fsf@gnu.org> <20190609152705.705c806b@mistral> <20190609154856.7d20feea@mistral> <20190609171036.18a89cb0@mistral> <87tvcymlba.fsf@telefonica.net> <20190610093324.2c71fc44@mistral> <87a7eptv1a.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="20632"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 10 16:09:05 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1haKyu-0004xl-T3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:09:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46900 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1haKyi-0000qJ-0I for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54711) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1haKr5-0003W7-IQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1haKqt-0001jm-9l for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:00:54 -0400 Original-Received: from pmta21.teksavvy.com ([76.10.157.36]:6354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1haKqt-0001id-2B for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:00:47 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2HWCwAAYv5c/0Tb1BhlHQIfBQeBT4EoA?= =?us-ascii?q?gEBY4FuKIQViHuMBTUBjiARi3QJAQEBOgECAQGEOgICAQECgnQkOBMBAwEBAQQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBBAICaSiFTAEEASMzKAsIAwkRAgUhAgIPSBmFDQMOD6cwgTGHeyFJgUYia?= =?us-ascii?q?iYCAQEBAYtwgT9AhCM+hRGCPYJYBKknCYIRgWmRTScMjGCKL6VbIoFYcBWDJ5B?= =?us-ascii?q?uJjCBAgEGAQEBFQgTBQUBAY5bAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2HWCwAAYv5c/0Tb1BhlHQIfBQeBT4EoAgEBY4FuKIQViHu?= =?us-ascii?q?MBTUBjiARi3QJAQEBOgECAQGEOgICAQECgnQkOBMBAwEBAQQBAQEBBAICaSiFT?= =?us-ascii?q?AEEASMzKAsIAwkRAgUhAgIPSBmFDQMOD6cwgTGHeyFJgUYiaiYCAQEBAYtwgT9?= =?us-ascii?q?AhCM+hRGCPYJYBKknCYIRgWmRTScMjGCKL6VbIoFYcBWDJ5BuJjCBAgEGAQEBF?= =?us-ascii?q?QgTBQUBAY5bAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,575,1549947600"; d="scan'208";a="94542355" Original-Received: from 24-212-219-68.cable.teksavvy.com (HELO mistral) ([24.212.219.68]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2019 10:00:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a7eptv1a.fsf@telefonica.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 76.10.157.36 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120894 Archived-At: On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:44:01 +0200 =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: > Even if what you see is everything that counts for you, the definition > of "instance" that you use is not correct, because you can change what > you see on frame1 while operating from frame2. Of course, it can be re-ordered. The thing is, though, is this overhead worthwhile to do at the beginning of each debugging session ? What are the benefits towards the work being done ? Especially in the light that the M-x gdb session actually starts with the gdb interactive buffer and source /automatically/ placed side-by-side by emacs. ... Only to be disrupted with the source thrown into another frame as soon as the debugging session starts.