Re: [Emacs] request: better subject lines

[<tomas@tuxteam.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:49:00PM +0800, Danny YUE wrote:
> 
> On 2017-05-03 08:49, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 11:12:05PM +0800, Danny YUE wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> Sharp, but makes sense.
> >
> > Sorry if it came across as "sharp". On a second reading I see what
> > you mean. That wasn't my intention.

[...]

> I believe there is a misunderstanding here, and I apologize if my
> expression made this happen.

Nevertheless you made me realize a point I'm glad I realized. So thanks
for that :)

> In fact I wanted to say "I agree with you". Maybe I should have put this
> line in front of my last email ;)
> 
> I took myself as an example to show that using (and making) better tool
> makes more sense than forcing every other human being to follow one
> pattern that cannot be easily judged better or worse.
> 
> Personally I do not think adding [TAG] into the subject line is a good
> idea, because that is more like a personal preference than something
> which really brings benefits. Some people favor it, some people hate
> it, some others don't really care, more of a taste instead of
> correctness.

I got from your message that *in content* we do agree, yes.

> Sorry again for unclear message.

No need to -- something good came out of that :-)

cheers
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlkJsGcACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYrHwCfZ1RnlBCCBC2qqkMroU+Vc0kL
m6AAnjd4PEGst4Tyzyq/GBoSyvSzhB3Q
=CixP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----