From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Suvayu Ali Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: From Gnus to mu4e Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:32:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20150827173210.GC30233@chitra.no-ip.org> References: <87d1yhpsbr.fsf@free.fr> <87lhczyl1p.fsf@free.fr> <87a8tezf7x.fsf@free.fr> <20150827125816.GA30233@chitra.no-ip.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440696782 7847 80.91.229.3 (27 Aug 2015 17:33:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:02 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 27 19:32:48 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV12V-0001hs-6s for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:32:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43852 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV12U-0002Dm-GX for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52179) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV129-000236-07 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV125-00021w-QB for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]:34233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV125-00021R-KV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:13 -0400 Original-Received: by widdq5 with SMTP id dq5so43101wid.1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:32:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=3eobhq+tKQDCcrxCd6l6ppshCwu2LbnbLBr51K8tl1U=; b=XDy83sx1gq+LS4fNzs60mzn6dFbReB5yobKgtMmaut/KQs3Ku5WZ1KoCMtn0xgOEKW e3cVgJgXk/ZqXXyZbW9sbrUBJEzQ8wRdBQayw4Ekh3TANXjywfL57hWvenknxG1SAUch 4m4Adq0yCnFYN3h8fOHnGIsaF5gJKg5zxeXRM26r5GolPuwF3e7QLvNRA+72qBFg8bfx sf8fkvlRdu37LNWJO8VxWdsNJPUc4MHwcA1tVBir/bBAFl/icdfFYOXrkfJahY1mlshN NwPSj7sBgwBEFkLeLAOozmN7DIzr7jeSgsFx4uRIf7f7THkSn6D2xsF0MQw6ZVSFi0o9 uXcA== X-Received: by 10.194.92.143 with SMTP id cm15mr6689533wjb.17.1440696733043; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from chitra.no-ip.org (5072840E.static.ziggozakelijk.nl. [80.114.132.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fi3sm14149wib.0.2015.08.27.10.32.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::232 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:106873 Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:52:05AM -0400, Glenn Morris wrote: > Suvayu Ali wrote: > > > Probably Bastien has more up to date comments, but last time I looked, I > > found Gnus's support for maildir rather poor. There were a few issues, > > it didn't respect the usual maildir flags and stored its own flags > > withing the maildir. So along with incorrect flag, the mail store took > > about ~70% more disk space. It was also a bit slow, despite everything > > being local. My impression is based on the status from about 2-3 years > > back, so things might have improved a lot by now. > > Flag handling at least is better since Emacs 24.3 > (http://debbugs.gnu.org/8055). > Thanks Glenn. Maybe one of these days I'll end up experimenting again. :) -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.