From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: A guide on setting up C/C++ development environment for Emacs Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:27:48 +0200 Organization: WMI UAM Message-ID: <20140829202748.186a6f10@aga-netbook> References: <87d2bjs6us.fsf@gmail.com> <20140829201133.4ec2831f@aga-netbook> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409336899 13905 80.91.229.3 (29 Aug 2014 18:28:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:28:19 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 29 20:28:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XNQuD-0007jD-LV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:28:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43711 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNQuD-0000sA-88 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53051) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNQty-0000s5-Jx for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNQts-00005N-RC for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:39891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNQts-000054-KA for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:27:52 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E54E46C87 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:27:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id toA5+XBLdqq6 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:27:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from aga-netbook (unknown [185.13.171.31]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5346646C7A for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:27:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20140829201133.4ec2831f@aga-netbook> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.20; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:808:114:2::50 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:99524 Archived-At: Dnia 2014-08-29, o godz. 14:15:48 Jai Dayal napisa=C5=82(a): > How is it different? One can't be more of X without resulting in being > partially X. One is either a bigot, or they aren't, so yes, he is > saying scientists are bigoted. Ah! Now I get it. You seem to be reasoning in binary categories. Either you are a bigot or not. Either something is science or not. Let me extrapolate a bit: either someone is an idiot or a genius. Which one are you? (SCNR...) And putting irony aside: *if* you claim that if someone is even *a tiny bit* bigoted, then he can be called a bigot, could you please tell me who is *not* a bigot? And here's a solution to your exercise: Rusi also said "in my experience", which you conveniently omitted from your "quotation", and also he used the words "scientific types", which is not exactly the same as "scientists" - as you "quoted" him. And, you silently ignored my second question. How convenient. > Faith is believing that something is true, regardless of what the > evidence clearly spells out. How is that not idiotic? I have to admit that it is the first time I see this definition of "faith", and I wouldn't agree with it. This closes the discussion (I hope so at least, I have some work to do, you know). Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University