From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski (by way of Marcin Borkowski ) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: A guide on setting up C/C++ development environment for Emacs Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:15:58 +0200 Organization: WMI UAM Message-ID: <20140828221558.67dfe1ef@aga-netbook> References: <513ad0e2-f7f4-484c-b17b-7c94a8c2fc7a@googlegroups.com> <87tx4x9353.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87ppfl91ft.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87lhq98zoy.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87ha0x8xbh.fsf@wanadoo.es> <0dd00724-ae02-4a11-9c9b-aa94a601c363@googlegroups.com> <20140828214327.48d41c9c@aga-netbook> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409257028 30054 80.91.229.3 (28 Aug 2014 20:17:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 20:17:08 +0000 (UTC) To: Jai Dayal Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 28 22:17:03 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XN67y-000818-9Y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:17:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38841 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XN67x-0007on-QJ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XN67h-0007oe-2U for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XN67b-0006Ph-C3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:44 -0400 Original-Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:39377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XN67b-0006PG-1J for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A43446C87 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:16:36 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WH-8HEtjKEDW for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:16:36 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from aga-netbook (unknown [185.13.171.31]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9EA346C7A for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:16:35 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.20; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:16:34 +0200 Resent-From: Marcin Borkowski Resent-Message-ID: <20140828221634.5ecb0263@aga-netbook> Resent-To: GNU Emacs users list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:808:114:2::50 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:99484 Archived-At: Dnia 2014-08-28, o godz. 15:47:03 Jai Dayal napisa=C5=82(a): > 1) Hitler was a Christian. How *exactly* do you define "Christian" here? > 2) What do you mean "false interpretations"? There's no canonical > interpretation of these religions, hence large factions exist between > almost all of them; killing under these "interpretations" is very much > dogma. Well, I know about at least one religion which actually has something close to "canonical interpretation" (I'm neither an expert on philosophy/theology, nor a native English speaker, but I suspect that the word "doctrine" is more suitable here than "interpretation" - hence my reservation.) Consequently, "factions" existing within this religion do indeed disagree on quite a lot of things (like: should capital punishment be used nowadays, or: is free market the best idea for economy, or: is Emacs better than Vim), but not the doctrine. Also, could you please check the meaning of the word "dogma" in your dictionary? > > So for me, it's rather a 0:0 draw. Of course, we *might* count in > pseudo-religious causes, but then why don't we count in > pseudo-science? Both ways of counting are similarly dishonest. >=20 > There is no such thing as pseudo-religion; it's all just religion. > Pseudo-science isn't even close to science. Well, sir, you are entitled to have your personal opinions. I'm afraid, though, that both above sentences are not correct. First of all, I didn't use the word "pseudoreligion" - I was writing about "pseudo-religious causes", which I tried to explain in the previous paragraph (though the term was probably badly chosen). Also, *if* pseudo-science weren't (in some its aspects at least) close to science, nobody would fall for it. And actually some contemporary parts of the so-called "science" are dangerously close to pseudo-science. Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University