From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: has frames behavior changed? Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:08:30 +0000 Message-ID: <20091107130830.GB5329@muc.de> References: <4AF51346.70804@uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257599062 13931 80.91.229.12 (7 Nov 2009 13:04:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Charlie Zender Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 07 14:04:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N6kxi-00084c-Ee for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:04:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60118 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N6kxh-0002Jf-Ou for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:04:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N6kxM-0002JR-BZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:03:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N6kxH-0002In-9s for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:03:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42913 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N6kxH-0002Ik-1e for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:03:47 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:3989 helo=mail.muc.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N6kxF-0004w6-Qr for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:03:46 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 7218 invoked by uid 3782); 7 Nov 2009 13:03:42 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD9E534B7.dip.t-dialin.net [217.229.52.183]) by colin2.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:03:41 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 5706 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Nov 2009 13:08:30 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF51346.70804@uci.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:69579 Archived-At: Hi, Charlie! On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 10:27:18PM -0800, Charlie Zender wrote: > hi, > this message refers to using emacs 22.2.1, and prior versions, on > ubuntu linux. > once upon a time, until about 6 mos. - 1 yr. ago, each emacs frame i > opened behaved like a sub-process of a single emacs process, e.g., if > the same buffer were displayed in multiple frames then editing that > buffer simultaneously updated all the frames. now, though, when i open > multiple frames in emacs, the frames do not seem to know what's going > on in the other frames. Could you, perhaps, be a bit more specific? Please give us a recipe, in terms of keystrokes, for what you do, what you used to see happening, and what you now see happening (or not happening), but in more precise terms than "do not seem to know what's going on in other frames". :-) > i have not changed how i start emacs at all. i like the old behavior > better. anyone know how to recover it? Yes, hopefully, just as soon as you tell us EXACTLY what has changed. Have a great and fruitful afternoon! > gracias, > charlie > -- > Charlie Zender, Department of Earth System Science > University of California, Irvine (949) 891-2429 :) -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).