From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Enlarging the question Was: Re: Does pclcvs support ssh protocol ? Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:00:13 +0100 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <200802230200.m1N20DAx007411@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080222.075409.183050664.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> <20080221231156.6ee15c74@reforged> <20080222.093951.48490765.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> <87r6f58i1q.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203734180 17033 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2008 02:36:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 02:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 23 03:36:45 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JSkFn-0004Fs-UJ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:36:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JSkFI-00040v-GA for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:36:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JSkD4-0002KB-MV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:33:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JSkD2-0002Hv-Bh for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:33:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JSkD2-0002Hl-3n for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:33:52 -0500 Original-Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JSkD1-00031I-JB for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:33:51 -0500 Original-Received: by master.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 77493C83A7; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:32:24 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1N20RJi007448; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:00:27 +0100 Original-Received: (from xma@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m1N20DAx007411; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:00:13 +0100 In-reply-to: <87r6f58i1q.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Thierry Volpiatto on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:19:29 +0100) User-Agent: Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.2 on GNU/Linux Jabber-ID: xma01@jabber.fr X-uucpssh: Found to be clean X-uucpssh-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.357, required 4.6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.04, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00) X-uucpssh-From: xma@gnu.org X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:51780 Archived-At: Hi, One thing you can do also is using sshfs: I tried in the past this solution and the performance were so bad that I revert my choice after 1 day or so. The same applies for the ftp FUSE project. I found that even tramp could outperform FUSE at this :) Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org