From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: planner or org or ... Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 23:45:12 +0200 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <200705272145.l4RLjCth005389@localhost.localdomain> References: <87hcpz3q9e.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180303275 4435 80.91.229.12 (27 May 2007 22:01:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 22:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 28 00:01:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HsQnZ-0008MD-0j for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 00:01:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HsQnY-0001N5-Oe for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 18:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HsQnF-0001JC-QZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 18:00:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HsQnE-0001IW-AV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 18:00:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HsQnE-0001IS-5Z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 18:00:52 -0400 Original-Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HsQnD-0006uK-Mb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 18:00:51 -0400 Original-Received: by master.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id CE20B6A274; Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:1001@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zogzog.home (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4RLjCpW005392; Sun, 27 May 2007 23:45:12 +0200 Original-Received: (from zedek@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l4RLjCth005389; Sun, 27 May 2007 23:45:12 +0200 In-reply-to: (message from Leo on Sun, 27 May 2007 12:44:40 +0100) User-Agent: Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.51.1 on GNU/Linux Jabber-ID: zedek@im.lolica.org X-uucpssh: Found to be clean X-uucpssh-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.289, required 4.6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.11, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00) X-uucpssh-From: xma@gnu.org X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:44491 Archived-At: ----- Tim X (2007-05-27) wrote:----- > So, I think that while the functionality is similar, the underlying > philosophy is a bit different and they approach things from a > different perspective re: planning and organising your work. On some > levels, it is a bit like a comparison of vi and emacs - both can > achieve the same outcomes, but do it differently and one way suits > some people while another way suits others. My main bias towards > planner mode is probably a simple as it being the first mode of this > type I used under emacs and it has set my expectations. The difference is: org is the Emacs of organizers. Planner is an organizer. org let you create your own way of GTD. Planner creates a way of GTD for you. I don't get it. In what org is more complicated than planner. I feel the contrary. Planner lets you create your *own* GTD too. Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org