* optimal skeleton definition
@ 2006-01-08 17:34 Martin Slouf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Slouf @ 2006-01-08 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
hi,
being not an elisp expert i wrote this kind of skeleton to simplify my java
getter/setter generation, which is later bound to some abbrev to be expanded
automatically.
- - - -
(define-skeleton java-getter-setter
"inserts java getter/setter pair"
nil (setq v1 (skeleton-read "Input Java type: "))
nil (setq v2 (skeleton-read "Input property name: "))
(setq method-part-name (concat (upcase (substring v2 0 1)) (substring v2 1)))
nil >"public " v1 " get" method-part-name "() {"?\n
>"return this." v2 ";"?\n
"}">""?\n\n
>"public void set" method-part-name "(" v1 " " v2 ") {"?\n
>"this." v2 " = " v2 ";"?\n
"}">)
- - - -
the problem of the code above is, that (setq ...) functions always return a
value and that value is printed into a buffer. Is there a chance not to print
the value of the setq s-expression to the buffer?
thanks. martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <mailman.359.1136741825.26925.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>]
* Re: optimal skeleton definition
[not found] <mailman.359.1136741825.26925.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
@ 2006-01-09 4:07 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2006-01-09 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
> being not an elisp expert i wrote this kind of skeleton to simplify my java
> getter/setter generation, which is later bound to some abbrev to be expanded
> automatically.
> - - - -
> (define-skeleton java-getter-setter
> "inserts java getter/setter pair"
> nil (setq v1 (skeleton-read "Input Java type: "))
> nil (setq v2 (skeleton-read "Input property name: "))
> (setq method-part-name (concat (upcase (substring v2 0 1)) (substring v2 1)))
> nil >"public " v1 " get" method-part-name "() {"?\n
>> "return this." v2 ";"?\n
> "}">""?\n\n
>> "public void set" method-part-name "(" v1 " " v2 ") {"?\n
>> "this." v2 " = " v2 ";"?\n
> "}">)
> - - - -
> the problem of the code above is, that (setq ...) functions always return
> a value and that value is printed into a buffer. Is there a chance not to
> print the value of the setq s-expression to the buffer?
Quote your setq. I.e. use
'(setq foo bar)
instead of
(setq foo bar)
-- Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-09 4:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-08 17:34 optimal skeleton definition Martin Slouf
[not found] <mailman.359.1136741825.26925.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-01-09 4:07 ` Stefan Monnier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).