unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Johnson <tim@johnsons-web.com>
Subject: Re: Emacs or XEmacs?
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 15:30:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050522233043.GC9004@johnsons-web.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6qser$tr6$1@news.net.uni-c.dk>

* JS <"dsa."@asdf.com> [050522 13:21]:
> What are the difference between Emacs and XEmacs? Will they both run on
> WinXP and is one better for something that the other?
 
  I like them both, and <sigh> in a (my) perfect world, the
  best of both would be in one.

  Although my main platform is linux, I've used both on XP.
  Xemacs was slightly easier to install because of the Wise
  kit, but emacs was no big deal, if I recall correctly.

  MTCW
  tim


-- 
Tim Johnson <tim@johnsons-web.com>
      http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-22 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-22 21:14 Emacs or XEmacs? JS
2005-05-22 21:28 ` David Kastrup
2005-05-22 23:30 ` Tim Johnson [this message]
2005-05-23  5:23 ` It's me FKtPp ;)
2005-05-23 16:09 ` Drew Adams
2005-05-23 18:23 ` Alan Mackenzie
     [not found] <mailman.1031732603.1996.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-14  8:33 ` emacs or xemacs? A. L. Meyers
     [not found] <mailman.1031674809.15931.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-10 17:34 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 18:57   ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:04     ` Henrik Enberg
2002-09-10 20:40       ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 19:05   ` Stefan Monnier <foo@acm.com>
2002-09-11  7:51 ` Adam
2002-09-11  8:21   ` Aurelio
2002-09-11  8:21   ` Aurelio
2002-09-11  8:34   ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-11 10:35     ` Sacha Chua
2002-09-11 22:25     ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12  8:29       ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-12  9:14         ` Zhongtao Zhu
2002-09-12 14:23         ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 19:33           ` maierh
2002-09-12 15:51         ` D. Goel
2002-09-11 21:36   ` Rodney Sparapani
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-10 16:18 Aurelio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050522233043.GC9004@johnsons-web.com \
    --to=tim@johnsons-web.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).