From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Postscript Print Buffer Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:01:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20050327200141.088AAC26C@atmalok> References: <20050325232211.6C58DC992@atmalok> <01c53201$Blat.v2.4$6b1ac600@zahav.net.il> <20050326131737.D6398C26A@atmalok> <01c53211$Blat.v2.4$0eb06040@zahav.net.il> <20050326235539.F2211C26A@atmalok> <01c532bd$Blat.v2.4$3869e940@zahav.net.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111954451 25579 80.91.229.2 (27 Mar 2005 20:14:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 27 22:14:08 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFe95-0003zw-UF for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:14:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFeP3-0007ou-0Y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:30:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DFeO6-0007Ot-61 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DFeNy-0007K7-Hq for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:29:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFeNx-0007ED-BJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:29:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.189] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DFdz8-0007J5-8I for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:03:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DFdz7-0007HL-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:03:45 +0200 Original-Received: from [84.171.150.228] (helo=atmalok) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DFdz7-0002XX-00 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:03:45 +0200 Original-Received: by atmalok (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 088AAC26C; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:01:41 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from atmalok (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atmalok (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8482C26B for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:01:41 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-reply-to: <01c532bd$Blat.v2.4$3869e940@zahav.net.il> Comments: In-reply-to "Eli Zaretskii" message dated "Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:06:50 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 7.82; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 21.4.1 X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:1f319457b87b086c07c81ac42a02b276 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:25220 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:25220 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > /f0 F <---------- > > (bel ) S <---------- > > 1 1 SB > > /f0 F <---------- > > (rgerlich) S <---------- > > On my machine, I see \334 and \344 here. Ah ... can you hint me to where to look, please? > Could you please try this in "emacs -q --no-site-file", without any > changes to the fonts, and see if that changes something? Did that - even removed .Xresources and logged in - no change. Exactly the same output. > And which Emacs version is that, btw? 21.4.1. on Debian Sarge > > > If you print out the entire Palatino font in your printer, does it > > > include accented Latin-9 characters? > > > > How can I do that ... I would like to give this a try The printer does print out Umlauts ... there is a message right BEFORE printing: "Fonts for some characters not found, continue anyway ..." so I suppose it's not the printer. > Inside Emacs, all of them are different. Ah, ok, but then there must be a table or whatever to check out ... no? I don't like to feel like a stupid ... :-( ray