From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Bretfeld Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Customizing coding priority Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:59:44 +0100 Message-ID: <17837.55152.906774.97483@relwi-sven.unibe.ch> References: <17837.26945.133317.830421@kamaloka.dhatu> Reply-To: sven.bretfeld@gmx.ch NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169020809 10379 80.91.229.12 (17 Jan 2007 08:00:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 17 09:00:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H75iG-00068H-LQ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:00:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H75iG-0003bo-HM for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H75i4-0003Zx-19 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:59:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H75i2-0003Xq-6M for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:59:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H75i2-0003XZ-0g for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:59:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [130.92.9.70] (helo=mailhub03.unibe.ch) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H75hz-00057n-Rh; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:59:48 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (scanhub02.unibe.ch [130.92.5.62]) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B7DB650B; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:59:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-checked: by University of Bern Original-Received: from mailhub03.unibe.ch ([130.92.9.70]) by localhost (scanhub02.unibe.ch [130.92.5.62]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3scje4m76kuy; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:59:44 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from bricktop.unibe.ch (bricktop-eth0.unibe.ch [130.92.4.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6C8B6594; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:59:44 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from relwi-sven.unibe.ch (relwi-sven.unibe.ch [130.92.194.51]) by bricktop.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02BBEA80AC; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:59:42 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:40388 Archived-At: > > The problem is that vm doesn't recognize Mails written in iso-8859-15 > > correctly > > Does that mean these mails are displayed incorrectly? The crazy thing is that they are displayed correctly when I read them. They are still correct when I write my reply. But the recipient of the reply (as well as my FCC-Box) receives something like this sample: > lieber sven > hast du letzten donnerstag einen neuen text verteilt? wenn ja, > k,bv(Bnntest du mir den vielleicht mailen? wenn nein, k,bv(Bnntest du mir > mitteilen, bis zu welchem satz ihr gekommen seid? > vielen dank und sch,bv(Bne gr,b|(Bsse > maria ,Adv|(B The last line outside the citation just containes three German umlauts (I use this example for testing). The broken characters in the citation are umlauts too. The headers of these replies say text/plain; iso-2022-jp was the Content-type. I've tried C-x RET iso-8859-15 as well as Peter's suggestion M-x prefer-coding-system iso-8859-15. But the problem is still exactly the same. What else can it be? In the meantime I found out that I can send a correctly encoded reply to the above cited message if I don't add any umlauts in my own answer. The citation stays intact then. This is not really practically useful, but maybe it could help to trace the problem. Thanks for your help Sven