From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: sdieselil@yahoo.com (sdieselil) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: key bindings Date: 13 Dec 2002 10:01:26 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <169a7283.0212131001.6550f502@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1039802798 15016 80.91.224.249 (13 Dec 2002 18:06:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 18:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18MuCq-0003tu-00 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:06:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18MuBe-0001B8-08 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:05:22 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 30 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.199.35.239 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1039802487 28623 127.0.0.1 (13 Dec 2002 18:01:27 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Dec 2002 18:01:27 GMT Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:108096 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:4627 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:4627 Hello to everyone! Recently I first downloaded Emacs (windows version for now). I was very impressed by its power but the most interesting feature for me was system of key bindings which was completely different from CUA-windows style. However I don't want to say that it's better than windows bindings. But I find cursor movement in Emacs much more powerful because it doesn't use keypad, which is placed so far from main keyboard block on standard 101-key keyboards. C-b, C-f, C-n, C-p are much more quickly to use (thought no so intuitive) than keypad arrow keys. On the other side arrow keys and C-z, C-x, C-c, C-v (for clipboard operations) are still very comfortable for me so I decide to make a mixed key bindings map: I propose to forget about keypad and instead implement it using C- keys but leave CUA key bindings for clipboard operations. For example , this is the most suitable map for me: C-j is left, C-l is right, C-i is up, C-, is down (since it looks like keypad but can be quickly reached by hand during speed typing). +---+---+---+ | | I | | ++--++--++--++ | J | | L | - looks like oblique keypad +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | , | | +---+---+---+ Does anybody know something about this system ? Or you can convince me that traditional Emacs system is better?