From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "malibu" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: 911 FORGERY bigger than the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion Date: 17 Sep 2006 09:21:47 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1158510107.577987.270340__20304.9443466172$1158511265$gmane$org@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> References: <1158425541.091561.152690@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1158503419.301412.70290@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158511265 32225 80.91.229.2 (17 Sep 2006 16:41:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 17 18:41:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GOzhY-0002kw-0Z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:41:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GOzhX-0003uM-9s for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:41:03 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: comp.lang.python, gnu.emacs.help, sci.physics, sci.chem, rec.crafts.metalworking Original-Lines: 44 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.89.72.115 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1158510111 17615 127.0.0.1 (17 Sep 2006 16:21:51 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:21:51 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1158503419.301412.70290@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.89.72.115; posting-account=5LrfcQwAAAALMIrgzBjR5QctkhUPSlgP Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu comp.lang.python:458636 gnu.emacs.help:141815 sci.physics:1230101 sci.chem:283684 rec.crafts.metalworking:787611 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:37437 Archived-At: tadchem wrote: > "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" was a fraud > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion > http://ddickerson.igc.org/protocols.html > http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mzionprotocol.html > http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoaxorum/hoaxorum1869.html > > The fraud was proven by identifying the sources used by the plagiarist > in 1921, but there are *still* those who believe it because it > justifies their racial hatred. > > Of course, like the 'Protocols', the 9/11 conspiracy hoax will be > embraced by those whose will to believe something that justifies their > irrational prejuduces exceeds their will to understand the implications > of rational data. > > As can be expected, there is a lot of overlap between the hateful > racists of the antisemitic groups and the delusional paranoids involved > in the 9/11 conspiracy theories. > > Tom Davidson > Richmond, VA There were many people who reported numerous explosions in the WTC buildings. When the firefighters arrived all the ground floor windows had been blown out. There were explosions in the sub-basement floors as reported by severely-injured caretakers who came up from there and by firefighters on the scene. Seismic records substantiate these claims. Isn't 'delusional paranoia' a little less substantive than that? Maybe you should actually *look* at the data- I know as a physicist you've kinda gotten away from that mindset. John