Re: help with M-x term

[op132650c@mail.telepac.pt]

>   Is there some reason why you aren't using M-x shell?

I don't want to detour the attention about the question of William Daffer, but i
also prefer M-x term instead of M-x shell, because the output of M-x shell is
not well formatted compared to M-x term.

Now i put the following question:

What's the difference between M-x shell and M-x term?

How can i configure M-x shell to be well formatted?

One example of the bad formatation of the output of M-x shell, is when i do ls
-la.
I get the following:

]]] file1     ]]] file3^]]]     ]]] file5^]]]
 ]]] file2   ]]] file4^]]]     ]]] file6^]]]


With the M-x term i get well formatted:

file1   file3   file5
file2   file4   file6




Citando William Daffer <whdaffer@wabcmail.com>:

> yz7502@gmail.com writes:
>
> > Hi guys,
> > I have a question on the M-x term environment
> > I'm using ksh and I have some aliases defined in .emacs_ksh.
>
>   Are you sourcing this file in your init files anywhere?
>
> > When I invoke M-x term, the aliases are not there.
> >
> > Should I define the aliases somewhere else?
>
>   Is there some reason why you aren't using M-x shell?
>
> whd
> --
> DISTANCE, n.  The only thing that the rich are willing for the poor to
> call theirs, and keep.
> 	-- Ambrose Bierce: _The Devil's Dictionary_
> _______________________________________________
> help-gnu-emacs mailing list
> help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
>