* looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 @ 2005-03-10 12:33 metoudi 2005-03-10 14:24 ` B.T. Raven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: metoudi @ 2005-03-10 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw) Hello, is a i586 version of NTEmacs is available somewhere for download? TIA ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 2005-03-10 12:33 looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 metoudi @ 2005-03-10 14:24 ` B.T. Raven 2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: B.T. Raven @ 2005-03-10 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw) <metoudi@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1110458030.018565.51970@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > Hello, > > is a i586 version of NTEmacs is available somewhere for download? > > TIA > Yes. Google on: emacs-21.3-fullbin-i386.tar.gz Ed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 2005-03-10 14:24 ` B.T. Raven @ 2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi 2005-03-11 14:08 ` Chong Yidong 2005-03-12 0:37 ` Jason Rumney 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: metoudi @ 2005-03-11 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw) Hello, this is the version I'm currently using. Are you sure that it's optimized for i586+? TIA ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi @ 2005-03-11 14:08 ` Chong Yidong 2005-03-12 0:37 ` Jason Rumney 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Chong Yidong @ 2005-03-11 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) > this is the version I'm currently using. Are you sure that it's > optimized for i586+? I don't think so. But why do you want i586 binaries, really? For an application like Emacs, which doesn't do any funny stuff like heavy-duty number crunching, the performance improvement over binaries optimized for i386 should be utterly negligible. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi 2005-03-11 14:08 ` Chong Yidong @ 2005-03-12 0:37 ` Jason Rumney 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jason Rumney @ 2005-03-12 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw) "metoudi@gmail.com" <metoudi@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, > this is the version I'm currently using. Are you sure that it's > optimized for i586+? I am sure it is not optimised for i586. The default settings in the w32 makefiles are to optimise for i686. Are these causing problems running on your old Pentiums? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-12 0:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-03-10 12:33 looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 metoudi 2005-03-10 14:24 ` B.T. Raven 2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi 2005-03-11 14:08 ` Chong Yidong 2005-03-12 0:37 ` Jason Rumney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).