* looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586
@ 2005-03-10 12:33 metoudi
2005-03-10 14:24 ` B.T. Raven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: metoudi @ 2005-03-10 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
is a i586 version of NTEmacs is available somewhere for download?
TIA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586
2005-03-10 12:33 looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 metoudi
@ 2005-03-10 14:24 ` B.T. Raven
2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: B.T. Raven @ 2005-03-10 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
<metoudi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110458030.018565.51970@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Hello,
>
> is a i586 version of NTEmacs is available somewhere for download?
>
> TIA
>
Yes.
Google on:
emacs-21.3-fullbin-i386.tar.gz
Ed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586
2005-03-10 14:24 ` B.T. Raven
@ 2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi
2005-03-11 14:08 ` Chong Yidong
2005-03-12 0:37 ` Jason Rumney
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: metoudi @ 2005-03-11 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
this is the version I'm currently using. Are you sure that it's
optimized for i586+?
TIA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586
2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi
@ 2005-03-11 14:08 ` Chong Yidong
2005-03-12 0:37 ` Jason Rumney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chong Yidong @ 2005-03-11 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
> this is the version I'm currently using. Are you sure that it's
> optimized for i586+?
I don't think so. But why do you want i586 binaries, really? For an
application like Emacs, which doesn't do any funny stuff like
heavy-duty number crunching, the performance improvement over binaries
optimized for i386 should be utterly negligible.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586
2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi
2005-03-11 14:08 ` Chong Yidong
@ 2005-03-12 0:37 ` Jason Rumney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason Rumney @ 2005-03-12 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
"metoudi@gmail.com" <metoudi@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello,
> this is the version I'm currently using. Are you sure that it's
> optimized for i586+?
I am sure it is not optimised for i586.
The default settings in the w32 makefiles are to optimise for i686.
Are these causing problems running on your old Pentiums?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-12 0:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-10 12:33 looking for NTEmacs binary optimized for i586 metoudi
2005-03-10 14:24 ` B.T. Raven
2005-03-11 11:22 ` metoudi
2005-03-11 14:08 ` Chong Yidong
2005-03-12 0:37 ` Jason Rumney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).