From: Dan Anderson <dan@mathjunkies.com>
Subject: Is it better to use eLISP or Common LISP?
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:22:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1066674163.4152.13.camel@syr-24-59-77-252.twcny.rr.com> (raw)
I am thinking of hacking some LISP for a project manager. I know that I
can either use Emacs LISP or the eLISP file that interfaces with common
LISP. Since I'd be learning LISP for the first time, what would be best
to do? Also, are there any reasons why?
-Dan
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-20 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-20 18:22 Dan Anderson [this message]
2003-10-20 20:37 ` Is it better to use eLISP or Common LISP? Sam Steingold
[not found] ` <mailman.2029.1066682270.21628.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-10-21 11:09 ` Phillip Lord
2003-10-21 14:36 ` Dan Anderson
[not found] ` <mailman.2070.1066747062.21628.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-10-21 14:53 ` Phillip Lord
2003-10-22 8:23 ` Tim X
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1066674163.4152.13.camel@syr-24-59-77-252.twcny.rr.com \
--to=dan@mathjunkies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).