unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel R. Anderson" <dan@mathjunkies.com>
Subject: Differences between Elisp and Lisp
Date: 29 Apr 2003 04:57:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1051606658.5151.29.camel@ny-chicagost2d-72.buf.adelphia.net> (raw)

On emacswiki.org there is a "wish list".  Quite a few people want emacs
to be based on another version of LISP.  Out of curiosity, what is it
that makes elisp inherently bad, or why would people want it to be
changed?

Thanks,

-Dan Anderson

             reply	other threads:[~2003-04-29  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-29  8:57 Daniel R. Anderson [this message]
     [not found] <mailman.5343.1051607007.21513.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-04-29 10:22 ` Differences between Elisp and Lisp Friedrich Dominicus
2003-04-29 10:27 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-04-29 10:35   ` David Kastrup
2003-04-29 11:03   ` Oliver Scholz
2003-04-29 12:23     ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 14:17       ` Thomas Link
2003-04-29 15:43         ` Kent M Pitman
2003-04-29 15:56           ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 16:44             ` Kent M Pitman
2003-04-29 17:16               ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 18:41                 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-30 12:39                   ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-30 13:12                     ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-30 18:07                     ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-04-29 18:59             ` Oliver Scholz
2003-04-30 12:43               ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 17:01       ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-30 23:02   ` Stefan Monnier
2003-05-01  5:22     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-05-01  5:41       ` Friedrich Dominicus
2003-05-01  5:54         ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
     [not found] ` <yoijznm9y5yr.fsf@bilbo.dd.chalmers.se>
2003-04-29 13:45   ` Kent M Pitman
2003-04-29 15:23     ` Nicolas Neuss
2003-04-29 15:28       ` Nicolas Neuss
2003-04-29 14:23   ` Marco Antoniotti
2003-04-29 14:29     ` Phillip Lord
2003-04-29 19:06       ` Oliver Scholz
2003-04-29 16:51 ` Kaz Kylheku

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1051606658.5151.29.camel@ny-chicagost2d-72.buf.adelphia.net \
    --to=dan@mathjunkies.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).