From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_R=c3=b6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: unescaped character literals Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 21:44:45 +0100 Message-ID: <08d59f77-5ceb-9e57-53a9-39a51a843d00@easy-emacs.de> References: <672e09a2-3ef6-6f3c-d7cc-1ffbbca1a251@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1518122723 1421 195.159.176.226 (8 Feb 2018 20:45:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 20:45:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 08 21:45:19 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ejt48-0007sB-3G for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 21:45:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47489 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejt69-0002LA-H4 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 15:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejt4i-0002Hf-8t for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 15:45:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejt4f-00037T-6C for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 15:45:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:47137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejt4e-00036S-SZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 15:45:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([188.103.26.47]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue007 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlLpD-1fIfOW161v-00bNs4 for ; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 21:45:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <672e09a2-3ef6-6f3c-d7cc-1ffbbca1a251@easy-emacs.de> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:FORleGm8Gr0UinUDpySF68hkqRFJiIlQEAha9He05/m6eYNd/ae 6nFWvBP3b4KBadYc1T2EeW8On87GW+AkwkCMQ2oxFmDWfc5YxSbytopVOg1EsDmxbBWGXfS HRaGmFtcEjLMukZ9bnfUI7vHLHl985A9Fxt1ihaiQ6LiU/+rO3z8W2329jZeYPp0mh63YYl cc5iLHquEUialrEfmX5Kg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:e00YE+ZSfbY=:Bf2tLgU3JzA1ju+tmAQR2a naS5Koqi4BtdhjjkvyB7ZQ9dn/WUhHf+Maz3QyRwzRVWyiz2luE/Hz/oAYK2bAdL920ZqgpFD WPfSyy4hHljvbOTowSZgwhoJ/eRIE+nTPgif4X1G2s743MBYds9DJFpEsKkIWcin7lsj6JeVT DYtxWWuz25vvVHm+sArWbnP2/k67zvdy7zQMXell5i7qe0VqDIA8hTtjRMouCSWstKavPyn88 Mv4EMyaN82W7VlU/qjZxnJOSawdi6oEM9uCjvYp1yk/VKNTUCeL1qvsAC28R0hk1elosVMW2e YVqNIvK56TmUQwjLZpYbkz4evLiJpMcTWKXGkL/TgmlRalSFmcvZqtviRFUXFLfY1g1QVrjL2 2VDZMdqGTKD36Dv0kkLOdiYEV3tdtaJrge+7oUt+DsNc7/LZhz/eojszsIzKhhTXun6/QWLg8 2eWetE/FpUiCanDu64/fo3tpyIgzxoL5xoCu4OES8qUK01EU0POGPOFQWonczP9Niut+uHcU6 Ltb62kLaxXKqnRLGemdW33VpUmSvS8OF0ou/wAzSIUdodWzf5Pgbh/EHUi12yPIof02QENgOo sEomMYu0CPhJ9AfgEJ+HHXWZFfePoW6LP8pgFKp4zViIaYN75NTM7tqoURNaGdDjiT+W2ESXE te5qixjctf71ZDgBwkOMe6dy4pXBcx97ACFVY0+968Tr6NbukXYW3HGsw42tq1Rj0mRvmI0AN p83uGE9D7kB0CgCXjwqeHwK35CaMIY35xMyFD3irh/jwJNsC2VcbwPt9K1Q= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.130 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:115941 Archived-At: On 08.02.2018 17:32, Andreas Röhler wrote: > When opening Emacs26-pretest, get a message: > > unescaped character literals `?)' detected! > > AFAIU it refers to a test which contains > > (should (eq (char-before) ?)) > > which seems right. Should that warning be reported as bug? > > Cheers, > > Andreas > Okay, should escape it, because otherwise the paren-match goes wrong.