From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "want.to.be.professer" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Which is better to navigate source code? Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:13:28 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <05102ae0-ce4f-4238-b4f0-130c1acd4571@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com> References: <873a3s22fp.fsf@ymail.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1260465313 9857 80.91.229.12 (10 Dec 2009 17:15:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:15:13 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 18:15:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NImbZ-0004XN-MD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:15:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60016 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NImbZ-0001HJ-2V for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:15:05 -0500 Original-Path: news.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 27 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 117.136.9.35 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1260404009 14801 127.0.0.1 (10 Dec 2009 00:13:29 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=117.136.9.35; posting-account=1V92oQoAAABsRS-TV0py9sQBc3NPTQ1S User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.33 Safari/532.0, gzip(gfe), gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: news.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:175465 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:09:07 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:70558 Archived-At: On 12=D4=C23=C8=D5, =C9=CF=CE=E710=CA=B153=B7=D6, Water Lin wrote: > I have a lot of code which I need to check under Linux. So I think use > Emacs my code brower is a good choice. > > But when I am using ECB, it seems that ECB can't get some tags for my > functions, class. What should I do to get some tags for my code? > > I checked EmacsWiki and it says that we have etags (which comes with > emacs), and ExuberantCtags which can generate tags file. And it says > that ExuberantCtags is the best choice as it supports more languages and > is more robust. > > So I think I need to use ECB together with ExuberantCtags, is it right? > > What's your tools? > > Thanks > > Water Lin > > -- > Water Lin's notes and pencils:http://en.waterlin.org > Email: Water...@ymail.com for C++'s 'class', CSCOPE is better than etags. ebrowse is also good.