From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Emacs becoming Word? Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:35:05 +0200 Message-ID: <01c53286$Blat.v2.4$7e961a60@zahav.net.il> References: <01c53229$Blat.v2.4$f7086e60@zahav.net.il> <01c53202$Blat.v2.4$fc3ff320@zahav.net.il> <20050327010804.GA32474@dionysus.ucolick.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111898585 10012 80.91.229.2 (27 Mar 2005 04:43:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 04:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 27 06:43:01 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFPbu-00033q-9W for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:42:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFPqy-0000FS-Vj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:58:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DFPqC-0008P4-CZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:57:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DFPq5-0008If-0O for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:57:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFPq2-00089S-Kf for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:57:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DFPXW-0005Le-Nb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:38:18 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-253-83.inter.net.il [83.130.253.83]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id AVM92487 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:38:17 +0200 (IST) Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: <20050327010804.GA32474@dionysus.ucolick.org> (message from Greg Novak on Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:08:04 -0800) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:25208 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:25208 > Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:08:04 -0800 > From: Greg Novak > > > So I think the response was appropriate, and precisely what he > > needed to hear, since he should look for the reasons in his own > > customizations. > > This is the fourth time in this thread that I've been told that I must > have turned on the features myself. This is in direct conflict with > the information I provided in the original post. The strange behavior > started after a version upgrade, _not_ after hacking around in my > .emacs file, fooling with any customization options, or anything. There's no conflict here (as you've been told several times): it's quite possible that something in your .emacs has different effects before and after the upgrade. What is important that you should go through your .emacs and look for customizations that turn on the features that annoy you. As I already told here, the Python mode would be my first suspect, unless similar problems occur in buffers that are not in Python mode.