From: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>,
emacs-tangents@gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
john@yates-sheets.org
Subject: Re: Too few people taking care of bug reports,
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:06:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2fv0cdz4y.fsf@Vulcan.attlocal.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5643AD34.3000803@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:03:48 +0200")
>>>>> Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:
> Still, though, the bug reports for ELPA packages that don't have any other
> upstream are supposed to go into the Emacs bug tracker anyway.
> It's not like upon moving a package to ELPA, we can immediately declare it
> obsolete. Right?
This is true. At least it will get a tag so that we know it's in ELPA. ELPA
packages have the advantage of being able to deliver bug fixes post-release
very easily. Anything that's in core has a much longer delay, and so is more
important to fix sooner for that reason.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-11 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAJnXXogfOJEO3fbiVnE-v3q_KAM71wO_YUw7NBehwTE4S1SMsQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <m2611ahqtq.fsf@Vulcan.attlocal.net>
[not found] ` <8337wdn6uu.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <m26119bxcj.fsf@Vulcan.attlocal.net>
[not found] ` <86611975jo.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org>
[not found] ` <838u65kxly.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <86mvuk4xxd.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
[not found] ` <831tbwlext.fsf@gnu.org>
2015-11-11 20:39 ` Too few people taking care of bug reports, was: Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?) Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-11 20:50 ` Too few people taking care of bug reports, John Wiegley
2015-11-11 21:03 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-11 21:06 ` John Wiegley [this message]
2015-11-11 21:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-11 21:10 ` Too few people taking care of bug reports, was: Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?) Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-11 21:15 ` Too few people taking care of bug reports, John Wiegley
2015-11-11 21:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-11 21:23 ` Too few people taking care of bug reports, was: Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?) Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-11 21:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-11 21:31 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-11 21:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-11 21:54 ` Dmitry Gutov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2fv0cdz4y.fsf@Vulcan.attlocal.net \
--to=jwiegley@gmail.com \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-tangents@gnu.org \
--cc=john@yates-sheets.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).