* Lisp sooo much better than Python - Re: 10 problems with Elisp, part 10 [not found] ` <87bk246al2.fsf@dataswamp.org> @ 2024-10-23 19:34 ` Jean Louis 0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread From: Jean Louis @ 2024-10-23 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-tangents; +Cc: Emanuel Berg [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 316 bytes --] * Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> [2024-08-07 13:52]: > > But should we consider Python as a technically > > better language? > > It doesn't take much experience to do cool things fast > in Python, it is a fact. > > In Lisp, _no one_ does that, almost. Let's face it, Lisp is soo much better than Python. :-D [-- Attachment #2: Relative speeds of 5 languages on 10 benchmarks from The Great Computer Language Shootout --] [-- Type: image/png, Size: 159394 bytes --] [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 92 bytes --] --- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-10-23 19:34 UTC | newest] Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <O3cegte--B-9@tuta.io> [not found] ` <87bk246al2.fsf@dataswamp.org> 2024-10-23 19:34 ` Lisp sooo much better than Python - Re: 10 problems with Elisp, part 10 Jean Louis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).