* Lisp sooo much better than Python - Re: 10 problems with Elisp, part 10
[not found] ` <87bk246al2.fsf@dataswamp.org>
@ 2024-10-23 19:34 ` Jean Louis
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jean Louis @ 2024-10-23 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-tangents; +Cc: Emanuel Berg
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 316 bytes --]
* Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> [2024-08-07 13:52]:
> > But should we consider Python as a technically
> > better language?
>
> It doesn't take much experience to do cool things fast
> in Python, it is a fact.
>
> In Lisp, _no one_ does that, almost.
Let's face it, Lisp is soo much better than Python. :-D
[-- Attachment #2: Relative speeds of 5 languages on 10 benchmarks from The Great Computer Language Shootout --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 159394 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 92 bytes --]
---
via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-10-23 19:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <O3cegte--B-9@tuta.io>
[not found] ` <87bk246al2.fsf@dataswamp.org>
2024-10-23 19:34 ` Lisp sooo much better than Python - Re: 10 problems with Elisp, part 10 Jean Louis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).