From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.tangents Subject: Re: 2023-02-27 Emacs news Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 21:55:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87cz5sfayn.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87ilfmprt2.fsf@sachachua.com> <87sfeqshwf.fsf@dataswamp.org> <88a8d27c-1eb3-b0f0-8929-027bbd024822@yandex.ru> <18b496f7-f23c-67c0-8694-0a71af46848c@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16543"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-tangents@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:rUZW5/GQLtr87dRswlPsFIZCqtc= Original-X-From: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 02 07:04:56 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pXc3k-00042C-A9 for get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 07:04:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pXc3R-0005EI-HH; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 01:04:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pXTUE-0001lj-8h for emacs-tangents@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 15:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pXTUC-0003Op-1D for emacs-tangents@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 15:55:41 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pXTU7-0002hA-KJ for emacs-tangents@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 21:55:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-tangents@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 01:04:35 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-tangents@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.tangents:997 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov wrote: > The htmlfontify and etags vulns look a little more > severe, though. It's better to just try to identify and fix all issues, big, small, security, documentation, whatever. No need to debate if it's important or not, if it's an improvement and a clear understanding of it as well as how it can be done - do it. Is what I think! -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal