From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.tangents
Subject: Re: Help building Pen.el (GPT for emacs)
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 19:45:05 +0300
Message-ID: <83v94zy832.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CACT87Jqbyqgm=uPb-rLLYE9BmWHfBFP4s9+cA8UcPJ-6nb3cLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <YPqV/Eatok3AuVok@protected.localdomain> <83r1fp1es9.fsf@gnu.org>
 <YPqosCqAWlaRnRvZ@protected.localdomain>
 <E1m76FD-0001jm-B9@fencepost.gnu.org> <837dhg1a1l.fsf@gnu.org>
 <YPvCZXxNyusHz9dP@protected.localdomain> <83wnpgyvwh.fsf@gnu.org>
 <YPvQ3UG3pdgjbiic@protected.localdomain>
 <83sg04ytnk.fsf@gnu.org> <YPw9Og60r5/LDdIo@protected.localdomain>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="1545"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: mullikine@gmail.com, emacs-tangents@gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, rms@gnu.org
To: Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>
Original-X-From: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 24 18:45:52 2021
Return-path: <emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1m7Kmd-00009v-50
	for get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 18:45:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35478 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1m7Kmb-0004Fg-Vr
	for get-emacs-tangents@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 12:45:50 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58350)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1m7KmL-0004CX-DA
 for emacs-tangents@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 12:45:33 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45112)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1m7KmL-0001qQ-1M; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 12:45:33 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1493
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1m7Km9-0003dU-8b; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 12:45:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <YPw9Og60r5/LDdIo@protected.localdomain> (message from Jean Louis
 on Sat, 24 Jul 2021 19:18:02 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-tangents@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other
 Emacs mailing lists <emacs-tangents.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-tangents>,
 <mailto:emacs-tangents-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-tangents>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-tangents@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-tangents-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents>,
 <mailto:emacs-tangents-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-tangents"
 <emacs-tangents-bounces+get-emacs-tangents=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.tangents:696
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.tangents/696>

> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 19:18:02 +0300
> From: Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>
> Cc: rms@gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, mullikine@gmail.com,
>   emacs-tangents@gnu.org
> 
> * Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> [2021-07-24 12:00]:
> > So please don't discourage independent assessment of this technology
> > by posting half-baked "legal" opinions from people with questionable
> > motivation (present company excluded, of course) representing that
> > this technology is legally incompatible with Free Software.  IMO, we
> > don't yet know enough for any such definitive opinions and
> > conclusions.
> 
> Quite contrary, the GPL licensing compliance question is related to
> adoption and expansion of free software. 
> 
> I have never stated it is incompatible with free software, I have
> asked how is GPL licensing compliance solved.

No, you said we shouldn't use this.