Re: A few questions about c++-ts-mode.

[Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>]

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 05:19:53PM GMT, Yuan Fu wrote:
>
>
>> On May 7, 2024, at 3:59 PM, Ergus <spacibba@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> There are a few differences between c++-ts-mode and c++-mode that I
>> don't know if should be reported or they are like that due to some
>> design choice.
>
>AFAIK, the design goal of c++-ts-mode is to follow c++-mode whenever possible.
>
>>
>> 1. namespaces are not fontified like in c-mode (i.e in std::string the
>>  `std` used to have font-lock-constant-face while `string` used to have
>>  font-lock-type-face). It seems like tresitter identifies properly them
>>  like (namespace_identifier) and (type_identifier)
>
>Then we probably want to fontify namespaces in constant face. Or perhaps add a namespace-face that inherits from constant face.
>
>> 2. Doc string comments are fontified like normal comments. It looks like
>>  treesiter does not recognize them at all. Is this something we need to
>>  report to treesitter or we need to workaround it in emacs side?
>
>I’m working on that. I think the best way is to workaround it in Emacs.
>
>> 3. macros like `#if defined(something)` fontifies the whole macro with
>>  same font (the `identifier` used to have no colors in c++-mode)
>
>We should update the fontification to leave out the identifier.
>
>Yuan

Hi Yuan:

Forgot to mention that

4. enum and enum class indentation is not working either

struct send {
      |
};

class send {
      |
};

enum send {
|
};

enum class send {
      |
};