From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: url library and GnuTLS, and Emacs-issued certificates Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:34:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mxkojpk4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hbawtbq7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878vw8hznm.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87ei5xsvl6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hbatofix.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ei5wpbks.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87lj01wj8o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301272486 29394 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2011 00:34:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:34:46 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 02:34:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q40Pk-0005ae-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:34:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40248 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q40Pk-0007bn-AU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:34:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52786 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q40Pf-0007bN-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:34:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q40Pd-0001b9-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:34:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:45460) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q40Pd-0001b5-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:34:29 -0400 Original-Received: from cyd by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q40Pd-0007oG-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:34:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Chong Yidong's message of "Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:42:27 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137767 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > Explaining the meanings of the :type makes the former scheme sound more > complicated: "try starttls if the :capability-command and :success and > :starttls-function parameters are present, otherwise open a normal > network stream". As opposed to "try starttls". > > But if you feel strongly about this, I won't insist; it's not an > important issue. Should I bring the default back? To be concrete, the doc would say something like this: If :type is omitted or nil, that specifies a `try-starttls' type connection if the :success, :capability-command, and :starttls-function parameters are all also given; otherwise, a plain network connection. Is that fine by you?