From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: running ./temacs Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:53:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83wro9bvjj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306853623 24819 80.91.229.12 (31 May 2011 14:53:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 16:53:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQKA-0006JM-Vr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:53:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40500 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQKA-0002XU-JK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:53:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQK4-0002X7-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:53:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQJz-0000Ey-8J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:53:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQJz-0000Eu-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQJy-0000eN-Uw; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:53:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 31 May 2011 04:44:25 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139976 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Dan Nicolaescu >> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 02:55:23 -0400 >> >> >> Any reason not to check this in? >> > >> > What would be the purpose of getting temacs run in GUI mode? >> >> Minimize the differences between temacs and emacs. Other than dumping, >> is it useful to have temacs and emacs behave differently? >> >> Hopefully temacs should be much easier to get to work under valgrind >> (and other similar tools) for example. >> Another use would be for cross-compiling. One can cross-compile temacs, >> but if the result behave differently, it's not very useful. If it >> behaved the same, it would start up slower, but it would otherwise work >> just the same as emacs. > > All these are worthy goals, IMO. And I see no reasons not to commit > your suggested changes. Thanks, checked in. The HAVE_NS code in dispnew.c might need similar treatment, but I can't test that one.