From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC and bzr. Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:20:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4BCF45FA.1060808@swipnet.se> <87eii7629z.fsf@telefonica.net> <87aasv5zsz.fsf@telefonica.net> <87633j5ya8.fsf@telefonica.net> <871ve75t1e.fsf@telefonica.net> <83633j48mi.fsf@gnu.org> <87sk6n4733.fsf@telefonica.net> <87hbn33zd2.fsf@telefonica.net> <87d3xq52u6.fsf@telefonica.net> <83zl0u3726.fsf@gnu.org> <878w8e44by.fsf@telefonica.net> <83d3xq2nb0.fsf@gnu.org> <58472.130.55.118.19.1272041644.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <49696.130.55.132.38.1272226688.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272230428 12439 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2010 21:20:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: herring@lanl.gov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 25 23:20:27 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O69FZ-0001Nx-Dg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:20:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40984 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O69FY-00064P-Kh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:20:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O69FR-00063w-BI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52541 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O69FQ-00063o-VC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:20:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O69FP-0005p3-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:20:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57874) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O69FP-0005oz-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:20:15 -0400 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O69FO-0004yr-0N; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:20:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49696.130.55.132.38.1272226688.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> (Davis Herring's message of "Sun\, 25 Apr 2010 13\:18\:08 -0700 \(PDT\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124207 Archived-At: "Davis Herring" writes: >>> (not that it was ever a documented feature, I suppose); perhaps we > should put it back, or > [...] >> Can you please file a bug with a step by step description of the problem? > > Is it really a bug? It's hard to say without being able to try it... > I thought it was just an accidental feature of C-x v > v that no longer existed. The docstring doesn't mention the case where > Emacs' idea of the file's status is out of date.