From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rename and clean unexec.c Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:46:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83hbjjcxex.fsf@gnu.org> <83bp9rcp19.fsf@gnu.org> <83sk2tvudb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281033968 28604 80.91.229.12 (5 Aug 2010 18:46:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 05 20:46:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh5SA-0005NF-0K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:46:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58737 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oh5S9-0001Jr-IF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57986 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oh5S5-0001Jm-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh5S4-0004H5-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:41097) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh5S4-0004H1-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:46:00 -0400 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh5S4-0000C4-38; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:46:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83sk2tvudb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu\, 05 Aug 2010 20\:31\:44 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128317 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:46:58 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> > From: Dan Nicolaescu >> > Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:46:12 -0400 >> > >> > I can't do it all, I don't know enough about what msdos wants there. >> >> That part's on me. > > I have a question here: do we want to strip unexcoff.c from everything > except what the MSDOS build needs? That would mean any platform that > will need COFF support will have to look for the code in prior revnos. > I don't mind, assuming others think it's the right thing. (Is it IMHO that's the right balance: it places the burden on (maybe) dealing with the code to whoever wants to do that in the future. > plausible that some future, e.g., mobile platform will use COFF?) Doubtful, every non-MAC, non-MS platform is ELF nowadays... > And what to do with "#ifdef emacs" -- should I leave the !emacs > branches or delete them? Remove.