From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: on msdos Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:39:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83mxp5b3mk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290238808 3732 80.91.229.12 (20 Nov 2010 07:40:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 07:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 20 08:40:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJi3I-0005nI-JB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:40:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJi3H-0002UW-LN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39088 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJi38-0002Tc-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:39:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJi37-0003L1-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:39:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJi37-0003Kt-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:39:53 -0500 Original-Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJi34-00049F-Vi; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:39:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83mxp5b3mk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri\, 19 Nov 2010 19\:54\:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132888 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:26:26 -0500 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> > It would be nicer to include it unconditionally everywhere, or to use >> > the same conditional everywhere. >> >> I could arrange for the MSDOS port to not define HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H, and >> then we could use that everywhere. > > Should I do this? Not sure. Are you sure that including sys/ioctl.h unconditionally has some bad effects? Is HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H currently defined? If yes, then it seems that the only extra places to include sys/ioctl.h would be keyboard.c and sound.c.