Re: emacs for pure Gtk3

[황병희 <soyeomul@doraji.xyz>]

Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com> writes:

>  ...
>  Make a screenshot.
>
> Sorry, only just saw this and I've already switched back to my 'normal' setup (based on emacs 27.1). 
>
> I did find a couple of minor 'quirks', but don't know if they might not have just been minor issues in current head
> anyway. 
>
> I did have to start the pgtk image with --no-x-resources switch to prevent it from segfaulting. 
>
> It doesn't look a lot different than normal Emacs. Those with more of an eye for the subtle aesthetics might notice
> more. I did notice that the fonts sizes were larger i.e. same font specification gave slightly larger fonts. Also
> noticed that on a couple of occasions, initial layout for something complex was a bit 'jumpy'. For example, I tried
> running spacemacs (which worked quite well) and the initial spash screen was all out of alignment initially (at the
> end of loading it re-aligned and was fine). 
>
> So, probably not quite ready for day to day use, but still pretty good and likely to be a real bonus for those running
> under Wayland who would like to get rid of the X layer completely. Emacs was one of the 2 reasons I stopped
> running Wauyland and switched back to X - the other being I was also running stumpwm (part of a little
> experiment I was doing where I was trying to make as much of my environment  on tools based on a
> lisp/functional approach as possible (stumpwm, emacs, nyxt, rep, guile, clojure, clojurescirpt etc). 
>
> Tim

Switching from X11 to Wayland for perfactly is my final goal in GNU
Emacs. Thanks for testing Tim^^^ Indeed...

Sincerely, Wayland fan Byung-Hee

-- 
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//