From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Declaring Lisp function types Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:46:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8634sdjgoj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32054"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, adam@alphapapa.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, arthur.miller@live.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 26 17:47:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rp9xI-00086U-DO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:47:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rp9wT-0006LW-OF; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:46:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rp9wM-0006L2-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:46:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rp9wL-0008V9-BA; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:46:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=IgCiOVVfuarsOYkz8MRZv+LSbKGKsFII2hoiprah3X4=; b=nAp4wwv2f7wFqidMc4R9 ZMrEzWHr/tVEjf+krVEFuFfk8stb5gZ2cNXwzNHghyD7ZP/2LoFk09TnqVxyzViW8d9aerm26mSu7 KkkHX8Yy0jS+/ln/hh5ZfHdtK576478eEe+WnduF6GTnsHyNQLkUjKsC6s7PGJOe0dNIWaVoFG0VC jr3nNB/lp5m7nPPxQZ6g8stMCfCEWQ4WLditB1ZUYBb1Qiu59PI0iy1llmTgJ+1U4IAZvTqtkx5aw Tdxzh2/VTjyzL2Rdk5i8EMmwB0lrx3jSlp14BrVoN4C40gx/W1UsLaOBZ/HMy7j1h/Rw9vbPslLa9 W91Ljyte/AhoiQ==; Original-Received: from acorallo by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rp9wA-0008RO-5N; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:46:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8634sdjgoj.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:55:40 +0200") X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317310 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , >> Adam Porter , Stefan Monnier >> , Arthur Miller >> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 06:13:26 -0400 >> >> Andrea Corallo writes: >> >> To make a summary of my understanding of this conversation on the >> various options so far: >> >> A couple of people mentioned would be a good idea to consider CL's >> syntax but this is problematic for how our declare machinery works. >> >> I think Eli and I preferred solution 1. >> >> Stefan suggested we go for 2 as it's more verbose (and this should >> discourage users at using it too much). >> >> Adam strongly opposed to 1 as it conflicts with his proposal [1] but >> AFAIU he agreed later on that thread on another solution so I guess the >> conflict should not be there anymore. >> >> If I've miss-summarized any opinion indeed please feel free to rectify. > > I think your summary is okay. Very few people responded with opinions > anyway. > >> I think we should make a decision (maintainers) so we can progress on >> this. > > Are you opposed to (2), i.e. > > (defun sum (a b) > (declare (type (function (integer integer) integer))) > (+ a b)) > > If not, I can live with it, and we have 3 people who are okay with it. I'm not opposed, I'm fine with it as well. Andrea