From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Pip Cet" <pipcet@protonmail.com>, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>,
"Mattias Engdegård" <mattiase@acm.org>,
"Paul Eggert" <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: New "make benchmark" target
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 05:59:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yp1h679cgkw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADwFkmnvZh+dSN3tPczr8Z5RVMS+vZRkK5FiCHpdymGY6yn9SA@mail.gmail.com> (Stefan Kangas's message of "Thu, 12 Dec 2024 02:53:40 -0800")
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> Pip Cet via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> writes:
>
>> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/elisp-benchmarks.html ? It'd be great if
>> we could agree on a benchmark, and even better if there were a way to
>> reliably run it from emacs -Q :-)
>>
>> In fact, I would suggest to move a reduced benchmark suite to the emacs
>> repo itself, and run it using "make benchmark".
>
> SGTM, but why a reduced suite and not just the whole thing?
My fear is that if we start going into the rabbit hole of which
benchmark of elisp-benchmarks should or should not be included, we will
never agree and as a consequence succeed. So I guess I'd favor as well
including all elisp-benchmarks.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-11 22:37 Improving EQ Pip Cet via Emacs development discussions.
2024-12-12 6:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-12-12 8:23 ` Andrea Corallo
2024-12-12 8:36 ` Pip Cet via Emacs development discussions.
2024-12-12 9:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-12-12 9:35 ` Visuwesh
2024-12-12 10:40 ` Andrea Corallo
2024-12-12 10:53 ` New "make benchmark" target Stefan Kangas
2024-12-12 10:59 ` Andrea Corallo [this message]
2024-12-12 10:42 ` Improving EQ Óscar Fuentes
2024-12-12 10:50 ` Andrea Corallo
2024-12-12 11:21 ` Óscar Fuentes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yp1h679cgkw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=acorallo@gnu.org \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=mattiase@acm.org \
--cc=pipcet@protonmail.com \
--cc=stefankangas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).