From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Koppelman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pop-to-buffer and friends new behavior or bug? Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:10:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zklhhcys.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308258753 13571 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2011 21:12:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 16 23:12:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXJrX-00006T-4C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:12:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57622 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXJrW-0001hg-26 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:12:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXJpY-0001OM-EA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXJpW-0006ap-42 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu ([130.39.16.10]:46064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXJpV-0006aA-N1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513FA28091; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:10:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ece.lsu.edu Original-Received: from ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RiyUKKD1vzyS; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:10:19 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sky.ece.lsu.edu (sky.ece.lsu.edu [130.39.222.98]) by ecelsrv1.ece.lsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD0A28081; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:10:18 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <87zklhhcys.fsf@gmail.com> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:02:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 130.39.16.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140572 Archived-At: On a similar note, I find annoying the new behavior of deleting a frame when its last buffer (whatever that means) is deleted, at least for frames which I explicitly open. Is that intended? Perhaps there should be some kind of option for this (more convenient than advicing window-deletable-p).