From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mailclient-send-it usage of browse-url Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:00:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86DDDA9D-2655-4B6C-A54E-AA87521C74E9@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271362898 708 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2010 20:21:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chad Brown Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 15 22:21:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2VZ3-0001Vq-1k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:21:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51843 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2VZ2-0003um-8w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:21:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2VYw-0003uc-TF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:21:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35827 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2VYv-0003uM-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:21:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2UJ5-0004FD-QL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com ([209.85.218.225]:40983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2UJ4-0004Ei-9y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:00:55 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so1791859bwz.8 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:00:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GM93EJJg58AYoSGlQdqI0je5pz0Er4Q7Noef09AjRNU=; b=Y7fUfBZKdn7TcMBqSTY44QYJ8KWiOKqg71QuBLTEqCn+zx9EAr3U2sRvRZqHVYQZ2+ 2GehisxM+uB+O7r7wscJoEYDOwZanE47OCt26+VOIJqxxD2uezBogm2/BRcHv47y5Z1W HtvwrwwfzSRld4FCAEUMzAZ+/KlM1tkS8dJbo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=lnDqMaC0esUI/o+jF3F6tYljDv4cq7byim54IKhfcKvTxE8pcNdH6dinPuAVCCGyJT ZBANAeK9Ozy5aceT1FTqQvk7GTwl7xrE7O+uoTAFGYzz2vNoTKds0y1xD0XPbwm5H6Ao PmFjZU3d/oyOF0JZHCz/mxm/OAThCNtJA6RqA= Original-Received: by 10.239.169.18 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:00:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Original-Received: by 10.239.180.198 with SMTP id j6mr49762hbg.163.1271358052158; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:00:52 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123722 Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Chad Brown wrote: > > > On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Lennart Borgman wrote: >> Better, but not good enough IMO since it does not work for web mail >> and a lot of users might have that. (Perhaps especially those that are >> making free software at home. I consider those as an important >> target.) >> >> As I have already said (without any response) for those users >> browse-url with an intermediate html file (see my prev) reply might be >> a better solution. And it probably works for mostly all who have a web >> browser. > > All the web mail systems I know today make it pretty easy to attach a file > to an outgoing message; maybe that would work better than putting the > (fairly large) text in the clipboard/cut-buffer? But what is on the clipboard in this case is the message body for the bug mail message. I do not think that should be sent as an attachment.